![fagilcious gay porn blog fagilcious gay porn blog](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5JAsK9zgbMU/TINcInSIVMI/AAAAAAAAH30/ARmlq7ajJzg/s1600/KrisEvans_4_PS++08.jpg)
It follows that most people didn't care, but that doesn't argue for either side. Only about 28% of the people who received the poll bothered to respond. If so, on what basis can you predicate your stance? The Ayatollah of Rockolla wrote:Are you trying to claim the study doesn't roughly represent the real opinion of people in the service? Nobody should be under the impression that this study was going to do anything but give him political cover for repeal. The main thing is, it was mostly improbable that this study would be of sound methodology and non-bias, because it's based on one of Obama's major campaign promises. This would be under current policy, not a time not too long ago when heterosexuals and homosexuals co-existed in harmonic bliss.
![fagilcious gay porn blog fagilcious gay porn blog](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1015212088598331393/Hp21gA-Q.jpg)
The study said 92% of responders who said they worked with someone they suspected was homosexual had a very good, good, or neither good or bad experience.
![fagilcious gay porn blog fagilcious gay porn blog](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dE9CMzCsFMM/SjHhKASvp9I/AAAAAAAABy4/NHxFQ_FBfZs/s400/castro_supreme_1.jpg)
The study moreso addresses the common argument against repeal (gay soldiers impact military readiness and unit cohesion) than asks the real question: "do you want openly gay men and women serving in the military?"Īlso, using testimonials that manifestly implicate DADT (as many of them do) don't argue its repeal. Less than half the people they sent the poll to responded, in part, because people tend to avoid answering polls where they assume their opinions wont be heard, or they fear some kind of retribution for answering honestly. I know it's terribly convenient for me to say this, but: this study is bullshit.